Activity

  • Kim Hardin posted an update 4 years, 2 months ago

    Before 1989, every military recruiter told countless 1000s of teenage boys and ladies considering military service, they will be guaranteed unequaled heath care benefits for serving at least two decades. These benefits were taught, as part of the curriculum, in Recruiting Schools and Career Counselor Training Courses being an incentive for joining and re-enlistment. During all the prior a lot of training, there’s no documentation of even a single recruiter or counselor questioning the validity of what they were promising. There was ask.fm/laradejesus12 , they were told a similar thing once they joined and retirees were receiving promised medical. Sadly, since 1989, it has not been the truth and the phrase "the truth changes" increasingly is used when speaking about most promises manufactured by our government.

    In 1975, I decided to become listed on the Navy. The first step of the process involved testing, physical, classification and most desirable, the promise, in return for 20 years’ service, free health care bills for me personally and my immediate family for the rest of our way of life. I joined and I served twenty years retiring in 1995. The words left out with the promise were "space available." Initially, this omission has not been important. Today, it’s got great significance. The reason; the military has downsized considerably with time and thus, you’ll find fewer doctors, nurses, other medical professionals, especially hospitals to deliver space available medical care. They are the words now being utilized as justification to switch military medical benefits.

    Most believe recruiters and career counselors have lied to military retirees and disabled service members, especially since 1959 when Congress enacted the "space available" addition to military Health Care. This was the very first of the quantity of laws enacted to lessen and limit use of Keep Our Promise to America’s Military Retirees Act 0f 2003 acknowledges promises of lifetime healthcare were made and broken for quite some time after these laws were passed.

    The quandary, Congress and the Joint Chiefs, never ordered military recruiters to stop promising free medical care for lifetime. Today, Congress blames recruiters for lying to new recruits. I wonder on the amount of members of the Congress who recruiters informed their Health Benefits would extend for lifetime should they served 20 or more years; now respond with ignorance of recruiter promises. In 1969, there are 329 veterans or retired inside your home and senate. Over time, the telephone number with military service has dropped to its current degree of 121. Their collective wartime service includes World War II, Korea, Vietnam, the Persian Gulf, Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Iraq.

    They all knew upon enlistment or commissioning the main advantages of joining the military and retiring. All who retired received or are receiving the advantage of this promise. Yet, after they entered the Congress or Senate, they treat addressing recruiter promises as taboo, avoiding any mention of military recruiters lying to them about benefits.

    I what food was in Navy Recruiting in about 1989, when we were informed to cease and desist telling prospective and new recruits about any guarantee of free health care forever. Although it was known since about 1959, Congress never gone to live in denied promises produced by recruiters were not authorized or had lots of people guaranteed through legislation.

    When I went along to Recruiting School in 1986, we had arrived taught free healthcare was obviously a critical recruiting tool, again, "space available" was not mentioned. Benefits were major compensation in enticing recruits to participate military services. I found this actually was and yes it was one of the major causes of my success in recruiting.

    The recruiter just isn’t at fault on this deception of millions, plus they would not lie, nor did I.
    click here was the Congress isn’t the fact that was being promised, yet did nothing to legitimize. Hundreds of members of the Congress served in the military and knew what recruiters promised, yet allowed continuation. They knew we were holding promising benefits not condoned or sustained by legislation and turned their heads because recruiting was successfully meeting the stress of National Security.

    australian aviation mag can be a unique extension of American society. Our pay and benefits pale not like our civilian counterparts. If there are no incentives for military retirement; if congress is allowed to erode the advantages of today’s retirees and disabled; how then do those entering the service or deciding to remain, believe promises they may be being guaranteed. Verbal Agreements are apparently enforceable only in the civilian sector; ignored inside the government, they’re susceptible to denial and change at discretion.

    The dilemma looming largest on the military horizon, will our President and Congress force the inclusion of "buyer beware" like a disclaimer warning future recruits, "the truth changes" in relation to benefits promised."

    Author Note: This article won’t address CHAMPUS or TRI-CARE as programs that have existed since 1967. It address what recruiters and career counselors knew before about 1989 for making promises that have been sanctioned but not legislatively authorized.